August 29th, 2008 By Laura
With all the media hype about a throw-down between Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, you would have thought the Democratic National Convention was going to devolve into an episode of American Gladiators. Yet despite the flames not only fanned, but in some cases actually lit by the media, the Democrats pulled off a masterpiece. The cattiness of Hillary Clinton and her supporters the was supposed to provide the drama never materialized. Clinton reminded any supporters who still resisted taking that chip off their shoulder were asked to consider if their support was about Hillary, or about a better future and an end to Republican mismanagement. After awhile, the media’s endless drum beat for Hillary v. Obama began to ring very hollow.
One after another, speakers stood before delegates and made an arguably air-tight case for why Barack Obama is the better choice for the presidency. Every weak, diversionary argument the Republicans have made were countered by an equal and opposite reality. Efforts to paint Obama as elite were rebutted with stories of his modest life as a child of a single mother, going to college on scholarships and loans as many of us do. Accusations of elitism began to crumble in the days leading up to the convention, when John McCain was unable to answer a question that most Americans would answer, “One,” or “None.” McCain has no idea how many houses he owns. So, who are we supposed to consider the elite candidate in this election?
The accusation that Obama does not have the experience to be president were met with reminders that the founder of the Republican Party, Abraham Lincoln, was elected President with roughly the same experience Obama has now–a stint in the Illinois state legislature and part of one term in Congress. Bill Clinton reminded us that the same arguments were used against him when he first ran, accepting his party’s nomination when he was two years younger than Obama is today. Assumptions of a close election were answered by Al Gore, who stated the obvious that among young voters, most active in politics for the first time, Obama has a considerable advantage.
And in the Democrat’s grand finale, the acceptance speech in front of 80,000 in a football stadium, Obama’s speech was no less than perfection. The “rock star” environment, often used as a slur by Republicans, was masterfully managed with the counterpoint of Obama’s humility, the added meat of the policy specifics that provided the substance many tried to paint as lacking, and point-by-point counterpoints for all the arguments the McCain camp has made against him. Obama even bravely took on the hot button issues that have divided this country for more than a generation: gun control, abortion, gay rights–he challenged virtually every issue that separates us with a call for compassion, community and common ground. Tears welled up when he challenged homophobia head-on, in front of millions watching on TV and online, saying:
I know there are differences on same-sex marriage, but surely we can agree that our gay and lesbian brothrs and sisters deserve to visit the person they love in a hospital and live their lives free of discrimination…Â This too is part of America’s promise - the promise of a democracy where we can find the strength and grace to bridge divides and unite in common effort.
Obama proved to be the master orator we had seen before, but not just for soaring rhetoric. There was sizzle, and steak to energize the masses. With an estimated 38 millioin watching on TV and 80,000 seeing history in person, Obama knocked it out of the park. I woke up this morning with a hope hangover. All observers, no matter their politics, are giving Obama his due today. It’s too bad Democrats didn’t take the opportunity for irony. In addition to fireworks and streamers, there should have been a banner unfurled in Denver, reading: Mission Accomplished.
Sphere: Related Content
Categories: Gay Rights, Gay marriage, Homophobia, Queer Politics, Uncategorized
Tags:
Barack Obama,
Democratic Politics,
Gay marriage,
Hillary Clinton,
Queer Politics |