The New York Times Buries Gay Prop 8 Protest Story
I am getting more than a little irritated by the mainstream media’s coverage of the anti-gay marriage amendments in California and elsewhere. Leafing through my Sunday New York Times this morning, I got hotter than my coffee to search for an article on the protests, only to find it buried on page 25. I wrote a Letter to the Editor to let them know that LGBT Americans are paying attention to their lack of coverage and interest in the issues that affect our lives. Here’s the content of my letter:
“To the Editors:
As a New York Times subscriber, blogger and lesbian, I am writing to express my disappointment in your coverage of the National Day of Protest Over Proposition 8 (“Across U.S., Big Rallies For Same-Sex Marriage,” page 25, Sunday, November 16, 2008). I had scoured the paper last Sunday looking for coverage of the passage of Proposition 8 in California (and the other anti-gay measures on ballots in Arkansas, Arizona and Florida) only to find an AP article printed deep into the paper. The editors apparently didn’t even see fit to assign a Times reporter to the story. I was very frustrated and disappointed. Then I heard about Saturday’s protests, and decided to attend the protest here in Atlanta as an outlet for my outrage (attended by an estimated 1,500 people, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution).
Again this Sunday, I checked The New York Times for articles on the protest. After well more than 100,000 LGBT Americans and fair-minded, freedom-loving heterosexual Americans braved wind, cold, rain and fire to protest the passage of Proposition 8, I would have expected more prominent coverage. Checking the front page, I finally spot a teaser for an article on the Rally for Gay Rights in the lower left-hand corner—the location of lowest-priority in newspapers. The teaser referred to page A25. Leafing past Sports, Arts & Leisure, Travel et. al., I finally located the article on page 25-which turns out to be page three of the National section.
Over one million people signed on to the Join the Impact social network in one week, according to the (ad hoc, volunteer, average citizen) social network organizers. Protests were planned in more than 30 American cities and in 10 foreign countries. How does such a large, national movement get relegated to page 25, behind a story on beer-drinking and whether or not President-elect Obama will have to give up his Blackberry?
Regarding the article itself, I found it to be generally fair yet somewhat downplayed in at least one regard: Estimates of protest participants on the Join the Impact website are (as of this writing) between 119,757 and 132,952. (See: http://jointheimpact.wetpaint.com/page/Attendance+Totals+(How+Many+Attended+in+Your+City).
Estimates are still coming in from around the country. It is, in my opinion, a more accurate characterization that protesters numbered well over 100,000, rather than the “tens of thousands,” as you reported.
Ironically, I subscribed to your paper at Atlanta’s Gay Pride Festival this summer. I have been a reader of the print and online additions off and on for years. If your coverage of the groundswell of protest over anti-gay marriage bigotry continues to be buried, what does it say about your editorial judgment in general? Do nationwide protests by hundreds of thousands of Americans not meet your criteria for news? Or is there some other, more political reason for your disinterest in and disrespect for LGBT Americans?”
You can read the Times article on the protests for yourself here. If you feel any media coverage of Prop 8, Join the Impact or other LGBT issues is biased or buried, I strongly urge you to consider writing a letter to the editor. It really does make a difference.
Sphere: Related ContentCategories: Gay Rights, Gay marriage, Queer Atlanta, Queer Media, Queer Politics, politics Tags: Gay marriage, Join the Impact, Prop8, Queer Media | No Comments





















